Commit Graph

4260 Commits (db84e5908dc4f2232700649992e834fd7630fa48)
 

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matthias Benkard db84e5908d btrfs-progs: mkfs: traverse_directory: Reset error code on continue
In case add_inode_items returned -EEXIST, traverse_directory would
handle the condition and still continue under certain circumstances, but
it would not reset the error code, leading to spurious failure later.
This patch fixes that.

Pull-request: #124
Author: Matthias Benkard <matthias.benkard@egym.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:40 +02:00
Axel Burri 09827a8a33 btrfs-progs: fix regression preventing send -p with subvolumes mounted on "/"
Fix subvol_strip_mountpoint for mnt="/" (len=1). In this case, skip
check for trailing slash on full_path (leading slash on full_path is
already asserted by strncmp).

Issue: #122
Pull-request: #138
Fixes: c5dc299aff ("btrfs-progs: prevent incorrect use of subvol_strip_mountpoint")
Signed-off-by: Axel Burri <axel@tty0.ch>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:40 +02:00
Lu Fengqi ad6973647e btrfs-progs: print-tree: remove dead code from btrfs_print_tree
Since the out label has been deleted, this free_extent_buffer will never
be executed.

Fixes: f37ae8d275 ("btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enhance warning on tree block level mismatch and error handling")
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:40 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 6fc1edc4c0 btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Fix -D option
Currently the -D option is essentially defunct since it's the root,
where we are going to corrupt a dir item is always set to the tree
root. Fix this by passing the root from the "-r" option. Aditionally
convert the interface for this option to the new format. So if one
wants to corrupt a dir item in the default fs tree, they should now
invoke:

 btrfs-corrupt-block -r 5 -D <objectid,DIR_ITEM,offset> -f name

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov f1404df7d1 btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Change format of -d option
Currently if we want to delete an item we need to invoke corrupt block
like so:

  btrfs-corrupt-block [-r <numeric id of root>] -K <objectid,type,offset> -d

Instead, this patch converts the format to:

  btrfs-corrupt-block [-r <numeric id of root>] -d <objectid,type,offset>

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 98eda1c098 btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Add support for handling specific root when using -K option
Currently the -K option supports corrupting items only in the default
root (which is the root tree). This makes it impossible to test the
free-space recovery (or any other) code for that matter. Fix it by
using the root corresponding to the one passed in -r (if any).

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 32acc8eed2 btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Factor out common "-r" handling code
Since more and more of the "corrupt XXX" options are going to support
combination with -r option, let's extract the common code needed for
this. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov f7a27396cf btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Convert -K flag argument handling to common function
There is now a common function used to parse btrfs keys triplets so
use that one. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 3fa8b8ca45 btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Change -I flag parameter format
Presently, if we want to corrupt a particular item we need to call
corrupt block like so:

btrfs-corrupt-block -I -K <objectid,type,offset> -r "numeric rootid"

This is problematic because the -K option not only sets the key to the
item that the -I option should corrupt but it also signals that we
want to corrupt the key itself. This way we cannot really use the
program with the following semantics:

"Corrupt only the item which corresponds to this key but leave the
key intact"

This patch aims to fix this by changing the format of the -I flag. So
if one wants to corrupt only an item (and leave the key intact) they
should use:

  btrfs-corrupt-block -r <numeric rootid> -I <objectid,type,offset>

In addition to this problem, -K doesn't really understand the the "-r"
argument, so when using it in conjunction with -I to corrupt an item,
not part of the root tree, it will always produce an error:

  Couldn't find the key to corrupt

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 572637b6f9 btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Factor out key parsing function
Currently passing a key with -K handling is open coded. I intend on
changing the interface a bit to make the program more usable. To aid
in this factor out common code which parses a triplet of the
"u64,u8,u64" format, corresponding to a btrfs key. No functional
changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
[ print optarg too ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 04be0e4b19 btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Correctly handle -r when passing -I
The documentation for the -I option (corrupt an item) states:

  An item to corrupt (must also specify the field to corrupt and a root+key for the item)

The code on the other hand doesn't check whether -r is in fact passed,
and even if it is it's not handled at all. This means presently -I
is possible to corrupt items only in the root tree. Fix this by
correctly checking -r is passed and fail otherwise and passing the
correct root to corrupt_btrfs_item.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 12087e6d75 btrfs-progs: corrupt-block: Factor out specific-root code
Some options operate on a specific root so let's extract the code which
deals with this. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:39 +02:00
Gu JinXiang bb9b8bcfd9 btrfs-progs: Add DEBUG_CFLAGS_INTERNAL for libbtrfsutil
Add DEBUG_CFLAGS_INTERNAL to LIBBTRFSUTIL_CFLAGS for libbtrfsutil's
build.

Signed-off-by: Gu JinXiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:38 +02:00
Misono Tomohiro 42cf0baead btrfs-progs: ins: dump-tree: Print tree name for extent data/tree block backref
Print tree name instead of number to make output more readable.

Example:
[before]
   extent data backref root 5 objectid 257 offset 16384 count 1

   tree block backref root 18446744073709551607

[after]
   extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 257 offset 16384 count 1

   tree block backref root DATA_RELOC_TREE

Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:38 +02:00
Misono Tomohiro b8f9a5e6e2 btrfs-progs: ins: dump-tree: Use %lld for extent data backref offset
Offset of extent data backref in extent item can be negative.
So, let's use %lld insteand of %llu to output readable value.

Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:38 +02:00
Ting-Chang Hou 6c817a1e6a btrfs-progs: restore: fix mistake on overwrite_ok() if relative path is given
fstatat will return -1 with errno EBADF if path_name is relative path.
This caused an error of the return value of overwrite_ok().
When restoring the subvolume to destination with relative path,
it will overwrite the existing file rather than skip it.

Signed-off-by: tchou <tchou@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:38 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 22bd1d5e35 btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enhance btrfs_print_tree() check to avoid out-of-boundary memory access
For btrfs_print_tree(), if nr_items is corrupted, it can easily go
beyond extent buffer boundary.

Add extra nr_item check, and only print as many valid slots as possible.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:38 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 9e2bf8c8ab btrfs-progs: Use symbolic names for read ahead behavior
Presently btrfs-progs haven't pulled the enum defining the symbolic
names of read ahead constants. This commit adds the enum and
simultaneously converts all usages to respective symbolic name.
No functional change, just making the code human readable.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:38 +02:00
Su Yue 6386ae4d8c btrfs-progs: fsck-tests: add test case to check symlinks with bad flags
There are two bad symlinks in the test case.  One is with immutable
attribute.  Another one is with append attribute.

Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:38 +02:00
Su Yue 42f7017ee6 btrfs-progs: check: lowmem: check symlinks with append/immutable flags
Define new error bit INODE_FLAGS_ERROR to represents invalid inode
flags error.

Symlinks should never have append/immutable flags set.
While checking inodes, if found a symlink with append/immutable
flags, report and record the inode flags error.

This is for lowmem mode.

Issue: #133
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:38 +02:00
Su Yue eef9f3eed6 btrfs-progs: check: check symlinks with append/immutable flags
Define new macro I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS to represents odd inode flags.

Symlinks should never have append/immutable flags.
While processing inodes, if found a symlink with append/immutable
flags, mark the inode record with I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS.

This is for original mode.

Issue: #133
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:37 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 723cab8a72 btrfs-progs: Remove fs_info argument from write_ctree_super
This function already takes a transaction handle which has a reference
to the fs_info, so use that to obtain it.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:37 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 947c2d56a4 btrfs-progs: Remove root argument from write_one_cache_group
It's not needed since we can acquire a reference to the fs_info from
the transaction handle already passed.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:37 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 2d99e810d9 btrfs-progs: Remove root argument from btrfs_set_block_flags
It's used only to get a reference to fs_info, which can be obtained from
the transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:37 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov a22b593587 btrfs-progs: Change btrfs_root to btrfs_fs_info argument in btrfs_lookup_extent_info
That function really wants an fs_info and not a root. Accidentally,
this also makes the kernel/user space signatures to be coherent.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:37 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 12e2280d7b btrfs-progs: check: Remove unused root argument from btrfs_extent_post_op
This is no longer used by the callees of that function so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:37 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov a93d51ede7 btrfs-progs: Remove unused argument from clean_tree_block
This function actually uses only the extent_buffer arg but takes 3
arguments. Furthermore, it's current interface doesn't even mirror
the kernel counterpart. Just remove the extra arguments.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:37 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov ebbcc81878 btrfs-progs: check: Make update_pinned_extents take btrfs_fs_info
This function needs btrfs_fs_info and not a root. So make it directly
take btrfs_fs_info,

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:36 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 64419cbf05 btrfs-progs: check: Remove root argument from finish_current_insert
Just reference it directly from trans->fs_info.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:36 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov cb2939c345 btrfs-progs: check: Remove root parameter from del_pending_extents
This function always operates on the extent root which can be
referenced from trans->fs_info. Do that to simplify function's
signature.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:36 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov b4c4ff9c4a btrfs-progs: check: Remove root parameter from btrfs_fix_block_accounting
It's always set to extent_root and the function already takes a
transaction handle where fs_info could be referenced and in turn
the extent_tree.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:36 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 48663d6e64 btrfs-progs: check: Remove root argument from delete_extent_records
This function is always passed the extent_root as "root" parameter. In
turn it uses the root parameter to mostly access fs_info and performs
only a single call to btrfs_update_block_group where it passses the
passed root. This is all redundant since fs_info can be referenced
from the transaction handle and in turn extent_root can be referenced
from the fs_info. So do that to simplify the function's signature.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:36 +02:00
Su Yue e2eb6dc4d4 btrfs-progs: tests: test mkfs.btrfs fails on small backing size thin provision device
This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such
devices.

This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe
("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device").

Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:36 +02:00
Su Yue 42a5710aca btrfs-progs: do not merge tree block refs have different root_id
For an extent item which contains many tree block backrefs, like

In 020-extent-ref-cases/keyed_block_ref.img

item 10 key (29470720 METADATA_ITEM 0) itemoff 3450 itemsize 222
                refs 23 gen 10 flags TREE_BLOCK
                tree block skinny level 0
                tree block backref root 278
                tree block backref root 277
                tree block backref root 276
                tree block backref root 275
                tree block backref root 274
                tree block backref root 273
                tree block backref root 272
                tree block backref root 271
                tree block backref root 270
                tree block backref root 269
                tree block backref root 268
                tree block backref root 267
                tree block backref root 266
                tree block backref root 265
                tree block backref root 264
                tree block backref root 263
                tree block backref root 262
                tree block backref root 261
                tree block backref root 260
                tree block backref root 259
                tree block backref root 258
                tree block backref root 257

In find_parent_nodes(), these refs's parents are 0, then __merge_refs
will merge refs to one ref. It causes only one root to be returned.

So, if both parents are 0, do not merge refs.

Lowmem check calls find_parent_nodes frequently to decide whether
check an extent buffer or not. The bug affects bytes accounting.

Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:36 +02:00
Su Yue d9b32dd2e9 btrfs-progs: remove useless branch in __merge_refs
After call of ref_for_same_block, ref1->parent must equals to
ref2->parent, the block of exchange is never reached.

So remove the block of exchange.

Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:36 +02:00
Su Yue 6a42806d74 btrfs-progs: remove comments about delayed ref in backref.c
There is no delayed ref in btrfs-progs, so remove related comments.

Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:35 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 8606fe4bcb btrfs-progs: Allow tree to be printed without an fs_info
For btrfs_print_tree() and btrfs_print_leaf(), the usage of fs_info is
mainly for nodesize and sectorsize.

However for nodesize, we can get it from @eb->len without the need for
fs_info at all.

For nodesize, introduce new helper BTRFS_NODEPTR_PER_EXTENT_BUFFER() to
get nodesize from @eb directly.
And with the help of previous modified btrfs_leaf_free_space(),
btrfs_print_tree() can live without fs_info at all.

For btrfs_print_leaf(), we modify print_extent_csum() to accept NULL
fs_info by skipping csum length calculation.

With all these modification, btrfs_print_tree/leaf() can be called
without accessing @fs_info at all, and make it more flexible to handle
binary tree block dump, or inside gdb.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:35 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 41750fe660 btrfs-progs: Remove fs_info parameter from btrfs_leaf_free_space()
For btrfs_leaf_free_space(), to get leaf data size, we have two way to
get it:

1) leaf->fs_info->nodesize
2) leaf->len

Anyway, we could get rid of @fs_info parameter for
btrfs_leaf_free_space().
And here we choose method 2), as it provides extra benefit to get leaf
free space without initializing a real fs_info.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:35 +02:00
Jeff Mahoney eb7b42003a btrfs-progs: build: detect whether -std=gnu90 is supported
GCC releases prior to 4.5.0 don't support -std=gnu90 so btrfs-progs won't
build at all on older distros.  We can detect whether the compiler
supports -std=gnu90 and fall back to -std=gnu89 if it doesn't.

AX_CHECK_COMPILE_FLAG is the right way to do this, but it depends on
autoconf 2.64.  AX_GCC_VERSION has been deprecated, so we'll use that
only for earlier autoconf versions so we can drop it when we drop
support for older autoconf releases.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:35 +02:00
Jeff Mahoney 1c73f56f5a btrfs-progs: build: autoconf 2.63 compatibility
Commit 2e1932e6a3 (btrfs-progs: build: simplify version tracking)
started m4_chomp to strip the newlines from the version file.  m4_chomp
was introduced in autoconf 2.64 but SLE11 ships with autoconf 2.63.
For purposes of just stripping the newline, m4_flatten is sufficient.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:35 +02:00
Jeff Mahoney 36da47b409 btrfs-progs: convert: fix support for e2fsprogs < 1.42
Commit 324d4c1857 (btrfs-progs: convert: Add larger device support)
introduced new dependencies on the 64-bit API provided by e2fsprogs.
That API was introduced in v1.42 (along with bigalloc).

This patch maps the following to their equivalents in e2fsprogs < 1.42.
- ext2fs_get_block_bitmap_range2
- ext2fs_inode_data_blocks2
- ext2fs_read_ext_attr2

Since we need to detect and define EXT2_FLAG_64BITS for compatibilty
anyway, it makes sense to use that to detect the older e2fsprogs instead
of defining a new flag ourselves.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:35 +02:00
Misono Tomohiro 4aebb2588c btrfs-progs: fi usage: change to output more info without root privilege
Although per device usage cannot be shown without root privilege,
per profile usage can be shown.

To achieve this, we just basically need to remove the check of nullness
of chunkinfo in print_filesystem_usage_by_chunk(), because other
functions except print_unused() properly handles chunkinfo by
chunkcount, which is 0 if chunkinfo is null.

As a result, "fi usage" always includes the information of "fi df".

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:35 +02:00
Misono Tomohiro 781792707a btrfs-progs: fi usage: change warning message more appropriately
"fi usage" shows the warning "RAID5/6 numbers will be incorrect" when
running without root privilege even if raid5/6 is not used.  What
happens is it cannot get the per device profile usage info, so change
the message more appropriately.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
[ adjust message ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:35 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 803f6c4714 btrfs-progs: Make __btrfs_fs_incompat return bool
First this function does the '!!' trick to turn its value into a bool,
yet the return type is int. Second, the kernel counterpart also returns
bool.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:34 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 5a621e039e btrfs-progs: check: Remove ext_ref local variable from check_fs_roots_lowmem
All real consumers of that variable have inlined the checks since they
are simple enough. So just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:34 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 03b6929079 btrfs-progs: check: Drop ext_ref arument from check_fs_root
It's no longer used so just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:34 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 511cd09d27 btrfs-progs: check: Drop ext_ref param from check_fs_first_inode
It's no longer used in that function so can be dropped altogether.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:34 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov d01839e95a btrfs-progs: check: Remove ext_ref param from walk_down_tree
It's no longer used so just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:34 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov cd62501086 btrfs-progs: check: Remove ext_ref param from check_fs_first_inode
It's no longer use and can be dropped.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:34 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov 1e154d9039 btrfs-progs: check: Drop unused ext_ref parameter from process_one_leaf
It's no longer used in the function so just remove it

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-06-07 16:37:34 +02:00