Bit-fields are layed out differently in visual C, this implements
a compatible mode. Checked against Visual C/C++ 2016.
Unfortunately the GCC implementation of MS layout (behind
-mms-bitfields) actually is different, and hence not compatible
with MS in all cases :-/
Such struct decl:
struct S { char a; int i;} __attribute__((packed));
should be accepted and cause S to be five bytes long (i.e.
the packed attribute should matter). So we can't layout
the members during parsing already. Split off the offset
and alignment calculation for this.
See testcases. We now support 64bit case constants. At the same time
also 64bit enum constants on L64 platforms (otherwise the Sym struct
isn't large enough for now). The testcase also checks for various
cases where sign/zero extension was confused.
In certain very specific situations (involving switches
with asms inside dead statement expressions) we could generate
invalid code (clobbering the buffer so much that we generated
invalid instructions). Don't emit the decision table if the
switch itself is dead.
When intializing members where the initializer needs relocations
and the member is initialized multiple times we can't allow
that to lead to multiple relocations to the same place. The last
one must win.
Similar to GCC a local asm register variable enforces the use of a
specified register in asm operands (and doesn't otherwise
matter). Works only if the variable is directly mentioned as
operand. For that we now generally store a backpointer from
an SValue to a Sym when the SValue was the result of unary()
parsing a symbol identifier.
If a condition is always zero/non-zero we can omit the
then or else code. This is complicated a bit by having to
deal with labels that might make such code reachable without
us yet knowing during parsing.
Not fully thought out. You can't jump inside stmt exprs,
but you can jump out of them. So there's a difference
between undefined but declared labels at the end of stmt
exprs and those defined inside. Additionally it should
also be checked if a label defined inside a stmt expr
was tentatively created as declared from outside.
I'm not prepared doing that right now, so simply revert.
This reverts commit 9160e4cab9147d77840cc44a285031fdb4640cf9.
One can't jump into statement expressions from outside
them, like the following:
int i = ({ label: foo(); 42; });
goto label;
We reject this by making the labels simply not available
outside (GCC has a nicer error message about jumping into
a statement expression).
In statement expression we really mustn't emit backward jumps
under nocode_wanted (they will form infinte loops as no expressions
are evaluated). Do-while and explicit loop with gotos weren't
handled.
The return value of statement expressions might refer to local
symbols, so those can't be popped. The old error message always
was just a band-aid, and since disabling it for pointer types it
wasn't effective anyway. It also never considered that also the
vtop->sym member might have referred to such symbols (see the
testcase with the local static, that used to segfault).
For fixing this (can be seen better with valgrind and SYM_DEBUG)
simply leave local symbols of stmt exprs on the stack.
But like GCC do warn about changes in signedness. The latter
leads to some changes in gen_assign_cast to not also warn about
unsigned* = int*
(where GCC warns, but only with extra warnings).
For
union U { struct {int a,b}; int c; };
union U u = {{ 1, 2, }};
The unnamed first member of union U needs to actually exist in the
structure so initializer parsing isn't confused about the double braces.
That means also the a and b members must be part of _that_, not of
union U directly. Which in turn means we need to do a bit more work
for field lookup.
See the testcase extension for more things that need to work.
Remove dead code and variables. Properly check for unions when
skipping fields in initializers. Make tests2/*.expect depend
on the .c files so they are automatically rebuilt when the latter
change.
E.g. "struct { struct S s; int a;} = { others, 42 };"
if 'others' is also a 'struct S'. Also when the value is a
compound literal. See added testcases.
Start reimplementing the whole initializer handling to be
conforming to ISO C. This patch just reimplements current
functionality to prepare for further changes, all tests pass.
This snippet is valid:
void foo(void);
... foo + 42 ...
the function designator is converted to pointer to function
implicitely. gen_op didn't do that and bailed out.
This must compile:
typedef int arrtype1[];
arrtype1 sinit19 = {1};
arrtype1 sinit20 = {2,3};
and generate two arrays of one resp. two elements. Before the fix
the determined size of the first array was encoded in the type
directly, so sinit20 couldn't be parsed anymore (because arrtype1
was thought to be only one element long).
Given this code:
struct __attribute__((...)) Name {...};
TCC was eating "Name", hence generating an anonymous struct.
It also didn't apply any packed attributes to the parsed
members. Both fixed. The testcase also contains a case
that isn't yet handled by TCC (under a BROKEN #define).
add_elf_sym is a confusing name because it is not clear what the
function does compared to put_elf_sym. As a matter of fact, put_elf_sym
also adds a symbol in a symbol table. Besides, "add_elf_sym" fails to
convey that the function can be used to update a symbol (for instance
its value). "set_elf_sym" seems like a more appropriate name: it will
set a symbol to a given set of properties (value, size, etc.) and create
a new one if non exist for that name as one would expect.
Michael Matz