fstatat will return -1 with errno EBADF if path_name is relative path.
This caused an error of the return value of overwrite_ok().
When restoring the subvolume to destination with relative path,
it will overwrite the existing file rather than skip it.
Signed-off-by: tchou <tchou@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs_print_tree(), if nr_items is corrupted, it can easily go
beyond extent buffer boundary.
Add extra nr_item check, and only print as many valid slots as possible.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Presently btrfs-progs haven't pulled the enum defining the symbolic
names of read ahead constants. This commit adds the enum and
simultaneously converts all usages to respective symbolic name.
No functional change, just making the code human readable.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are two bad symlinks in the test case. One is with immutable
attribute. Another one is with append attribute.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Define new error bit INODE_FLAGS_ERROR to represents invalid inode
flags error.
Symlinks should never have append/immutable flags set.
While checking inodes, if found a symlink with append/immutable
flags, report and record the inode flags error.
This is for lowmem mode.
Issue: #133
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Define new macro I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS to represents odd inode flags.
Symlinks should never have append/immutable flags.
While processing inodes, if found a symlink with append/immutable
flags, mark the inode record with I_ERR_ODD_INODE_FLAGS.
This is for original mode.
Issue: #133
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function already takes a transaction handle which has a reference
to the fs_info, so use that to obtain it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's not needed since we can acquire a reference to the fs_info from
the transaction handle already passed.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's used only to get a reference to fs_info, which can be obtained from
the transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
That function really wants an fs_info and not a root. Accidentally,
this also makes the kernel/user space signatures to be coherent.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is no longer used by the callees of that function so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function actually uses only the extent_buffer arg but takes 3
arguments. Furthermore, it's current interface doesn't even mirror
the kernel counterpart. Just remove the extra arguments.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function needs btrfs_fs_info and not a root. So make it directly
take btrfs_fs_info,
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Just reference it directly from trans->fs_info.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function always operates on the extent root which can be
referenced from trans->fs_info. Do that to simplify function's
signature.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's always set to extent_root and the function already takes a
transaction handle where fs_info could be referenced and in turn
the extent_tree.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always passed the extent_root as "root" parameter. In
turn it uses the root parameter to mostly access fs_info and performs
only a single call to btrfs_update_block_group where it passses the
passed root. This is all redundant since fs_info can be referenced
from the transaction handle and in turn extent_root can be referenced
from the fs_info. So do that to simplify the function's signature.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This tests is most similar to xfstests generic/405.
It calls device mapper to create a thin provision device with small
backing size and big virtual size. mkfs.btrfs should fail on such
devices.
This test should pass after commit e805b143a4fe
("btrfs-progs: mkfs: return nozero value on thin provisioned device").
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For an extent item which contains many tree block backrefs, like
In 020-extent-ref-cases/keyed_block_ref.img
item 10 key (29470720 METADATA_ITEM 0) itemoff 3450 itemsize 222
refs 23 gen 10 flags TREE_BLOCK
tree block skinny level 0
tree block backref root 278
tree block backref root 277
tree block backref root 276
tree block backref root 275
tree block backref root 274
tree block backref root 273
tree block backref root 272
tree block backref root 271
tree block backref root 270
tree block backref root 269
tree block backref root 268
tree block backref root 267
tree block backref root 266
tree block backref root 265
tree block backref root 264
tree block backref root 263
tree block backref root 262
tree block backref root 261
tree block backref root 260
tree block backref root 259
tree block backref root 258
tree block backref root 257
In find_parent_nodes(), these refs's parents are 0, then __merge_refs
will merge refs to one ref. It causes only one root to be returned.
So, if both parents are 0, do not merge refs.
Lowmem check calls find_parent_nodes frequently to decide whether
check an extent buffer or not. The bug affects bytes accounting.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
After call of ref_for_same_block, ref1->parent must equals to
ref2->parent, the block of exchange is never reached.
So remove the block of exchange.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There is no delayed ref in btrfs-progs, so remove related comments.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs_print_tree() and btrfs_print_leaf(), the usage of fs_info is
mainly for nodesize and sectorsize.
However for nodesize, we can get it from @eb->len without the need for
fs_info at all.
For nodesize, introduce new helper BTRFS_NODEPTR_PER_EXTENT_BUFFER() to
get nodesize from @eb directly.
And with the help of previous modified btrfs_leaf_free_space(),
btrfs_print_tree() can live without fs_info at all.
For btrfs_print_leaf(), we modify print_extent_csum() to accept NULL
fs_info by skipping csum length calculation.
With all these modification, btrfs_print_tree/leaf() can be called
without accessing @fs_info at all, and make it more flexible to handle
binary tree block dump, or inside gdb.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs_leaf_free_space(), to get leaf data size, we have two way to
get it:
1) leaf->fs_info->nodesize
2) leaf->len
Anyway, we could get rid of @fs_info parameter for
btrfs_leaf_free_space().
And here we choose method 2), as it provides extra benefit to get leaf
free space without initializing a real fs_info.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
GCC releases prior to 4.5.0 don't support -std=gnu90 so btrfs-progs won't
build at all on older distros. We can detect whether the compiler
supports -std=gnu90 and fall back to -std=gnu89 if it doesn't.
AX_CHECK_COMPILE_FLAG is the right way to do this, but it depends on
autoconf 2.64. AX_GCC_VERSION has been deprecated, so we'll use that
only for earlier autoconf versions so we can drop it when we drop
support for older autoconf releases.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 2e1932e6a3 (btrfs-progs: build: simplify version tracking)
started m4_chomp to strip the newlines from the version file. m4_chomp
was introduced in autoconf 2.64 but SLE11 ships with autoconf 2.63.
For purposes of just stripping the newline, m4_flatten is sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 324d4c1857 (btrfs-progs: convert: Add larger device support)
introduced new dependencies on the 64-bit API provided by e2fsprogs.
That API was introduced in v1.42 (along with bigalloc).
This patch maps the following to their equivalents in e2fsprogs < 1.42.
- ext2fs_get_block_bitmap_range2
- ext2fs_inode_data_blocks2
- ext2fs_read_ext_attr2
Since we need to detect and define EXT2_FLAG_64BITS for compatibilty
anyway, it makes sense to use that to detect the older e2fsprogs instead
of defining a new flag ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Although per device usage cannot be shown without root privilege,
per profile usage can be shown.
To achieve this, we just basically need to remove the check of nullness
of chunkinfo in print_filesystem_usage_by_chunk(), because other
functions except print_unused() properly handles chunkinfo by
chunkcount, which is 0 if chunkinfo is null.
As a result, "fi usage" always includes the information of "fi df".
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
"fi usage" shows the warning "RAID5/6 numbers will be incorrect" when
running without root privilege even if raid5/6 is not used. What
happens is it cannot get the per device profile usage info, so change
the message more appropriately.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
[ adjust message ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
First this function does the '!!' trick to turn its value into a bool,
yet the return type is int. Second, the kernel counterpart also returns
bool.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All real consumers of that variable have inlined the checks since they
are simple enough. So just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's no longer used so just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's no longer used in that function so can be dropped altogether.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's no longer used so just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's no longer use and can be dropped.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's no longer used in the function so just remove it
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We can derive this argument from root->fs_info and also make it local
to the sole switch case it's used.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This parameter is no longer used in this function, so drop it
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is a boolean parameter which signals whether the fs has the
EXTENDED_IREF feature flag toggled or not. Since a reference to fs_info
can be obtained there is no need to pollute the interface.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Verify that if we have an otherwise clean filesystem, containging
collided DIR_ITEM, btrfs check lowmem's mode can correctly handle those
and not produce any false positives.
This if fixed by commit titled:
"btrfs-progs: check: fix DIR_ITEM checking in lowmem"
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When checking the validity of a DIR_ITEM item the index variable is
explicitly set to -1 so that the index check in find_inode_ref() is
ignored. This is necessary due to possible name collisions in DIR_ITEMS
(i.e. multiple files with the same crc32c for their names, resulting in
the identical key->offset). Currently the code is broken due to index
being set to -1 at the beginning of check_dir_item and subsequently
reset to the index found in find_inode_ref. On subsequent iterations of
the while loop in check_dir_items we are going to erroneously perform
index checking, since index is not -1 but whatever the index value of
the last handled INODE_REF ITEM.
Without this patch check in lowmem mode produces the following false
warnings positivess:
ERROR: root 5 INODE REF[1991456, 256] name 5ab4e28b~~~~~~~~QBXUT2GBJDRT5CB6ZWAJVDHK filetype 1 missing
But the items for this name are in fact correct:
------------------SNIP------------------------
item 13 key (256 DIR_ITEM 4227063046) itemoff 2945 itemsize 140
location key (220890 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE
transid 2278 data_len 0 name_len 40
name: 5ab4e1bb~~~~~~~~65KNTAWVJ5VD4SV2R3BKFCXL
location key (1991456 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE
transid 2285 data_len 0 name_len 40
name: 5ab4e28b~~~~~~~~QBXUT2GBJDRT5CB6ZWAJVDHK
item 21 key (1991456 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 2104 itemsize 50
index 1934146 namelen 40 name: 5ab4e28b~~~~~~~~QBXUT2GBJDRT5CB6ZWAJVDHK
-------------------SNIP-------------------------
Fix this by moving the code setting index at the beginning of the while
loop. This ensure that for each item in DIR_ITEM we have index set
correctly.
Fixes: 564901eac7 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce print_dir_item_err()")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since the test case uses run_mustfail(), which is pretty easy pass due to
other unexpected problems, so here an extra run_check() is added to
ensure we don't only report qgroup error, but also fix it without
problem.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Current btrfs-check will check qgroup consistency, but even when it
finds something wrong, the return value is still 0.
Fix it by allowing report_qgroups() to return int to indicate qgroup
mismatch, and also add extra logic to return no error if qgroup repair
is successful.
Without this patch, fstests can't detect qgroup corruption by its fsck
alone.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Originally commit 2681e00f00 ("btrfs-progs: check for matchingi
free space in cache") added the account_super_bytes function to prevent
false negative when running btrfs check. Turns out this function is
really copied exclude_super_stripes, excluding the calls to
exclude_super_stripes. Later commit e4797df6a9 ("btrfs-progs: check
the free space tree in btrfsck") introduced proper version of
exclude_super_stripes. Instead of duplicating the function, just remove
account_super_bytes and use exclude_super_stripes instead of the former.
This also has the benefit of bringing the userspace code a bit closer
to the kernel counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since commit aaf2dac5ef ("btrfs-progs: qgroup: split update_qgroup to
reduce arguments") cause qgroup show to output the wrong qgroup
parent-child relationship, in addition to fixing the problem, a test case
is needed to prevent the similar problem in the future.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The QGROUP_RELATION item is very special, it always exists in pairs
(with objectid and offset exchanged). Its objectid and offset are the
ids of a pair of parent and child qgroups, respectively. The larger one
is parent and the smaller one is child. After the following commit, the
order of the parameters is wrong and causes qgroup show to output the
wrong qgroup parent-child relationship.
Fixes: aaf2dac5ef ("btrfs-progs: qgroup: split update_qgroup to reduce arguments")
Issue: #129
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Normally corrupted leaf should be caught by csum check, but sometimes
corrupted item pointers (out of leaf range) can still pass csum check.
In fact, our fsck/005 test case image has such corrupted item pointer
and btrfs check can surprisingly fix it.
Anyway, make print-tree to skip such item and remaining slots to avoid
segfault.
Please note that, in btrfs-progs we can't put such check into
check_tree_block() nor do kernel level comprehensive check as under
certain case, btrfs-progs can handle or even repair it.
A strict check_tree_block() or backporting kernel btrfs_check_leaf()
could break such test cases and reduce the utility of btrfs-progs.
Issue: #128
Reported-by: Hubert Kario <hubert@kario.pl>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with objectid set to 0. So remove the
parameter and statically set the ->objectid to 0 when allocating a new
extent.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 17793e3e6a ("Btrfs-progs: extend the extent cache for the
device extent") extended the cache extent APIs to support objectid to
distinguish between phyisical extents with same dimensions but on
different devices. However, it seems that this particular function is
not used to allocate a device extent with accompanying objectid.
Instead such extents as processed solely by insert_device_extent_record.
Remove the unused code as a result.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This parameter was introduced with the original implementation of the
function but has never really been used, so just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Ting-Chang Hou