From gcc docs: "You may also specify attributes between the enum, struct or union tag and the name of the type rather than after the closing brace."
Adds `82_attribs_position.c` in `tests/tests2`
made like in pcc
(pcc.ludd.ltu.se/ftp/pub/pcc-docs/pcc-utf8-ver3.pdf)
We treat all chars with high bit set as alphabetic.
This allow code like
#include <stdio.h>
int Lefèvre=2;
int main() {
printf("Lefèvre=%d\n",Lefèvre);
return 0;
}
modified version of the old one which don't allow '.'
in #define Identifiers. This allow correctly preprocess
the following code in *.S
#define SRC(y...) \
9999: y; \
.section __ex_table, "a"; \
.long 9999b, 6001f ; \
// .previous
SRC(1: movw (%esi), %bx)
6001:
A test included.
the check on incomplete struct/union/enum types was too early,
disallowing mixed specifiers and qualifiers. Simply rely on
the size (->c) field for that. See testcases.
* Documentation is now in "docs".
* Source code is now in "src".
* Misc. fixes here and there so that everything still works.
I think I got everything in this commit, but I only tested this
on Linux (Make) and Windows (CMake), so I might've messed
something up on other platforms...
Jsut for testing. It works for me (don't break anything)
Small fixes for x86_64-gen.c in "tccpp: fix issues, add tests"
are dropped in flavor of this patch.
Pip Cet:
Okay, here's a first patch that fixes the problem (but I've found
another bug, yet unfixed, in the process), though it's not
particularly pretty code (I tried hard to keep the changes to the
minimum necessary). If we decide to actually get rid of VT_QLONG and
VT_QFLOAT (please, can we?), there are some further simplifications in
tccgen.c that might offset some of the cost of this patch.
The idea is that an integer is no longer enough to describe how an
argument is stored in registers. There are a number of possibilities
(none, integer register, two integer registers, float register, two
float registers, integer register plus float register, float register
plus integer register), and instead of enumerating them I've
introduced a RegArgs type that stores the offsets for each of our
registers (for the other architectures, it's simply an int specifying
the number of registers). If someone strongly prefers an enum, we
could do that instead, but I believe this is a place where keeping
things general is worth it, because this way it should be doable to
add SSE or AVX support.
There is one line in the patch that looks suspicious:
} else {
addr = (addr + align - 1) & -align;
param_addr = addr;
addr += size;
- sse_param_index += reg_count;
}
break;
However, this actually fixes one half of a bug we have when calling a
function with eight double arguments "interrupted" by a two-double
structure after the seventh double argument:
f(double,double,double,double,double,double,double,struct { double
x,y; },double);
In this case, the last argument should be passed in %xmm7. This patch
fixes the problem in gfunc_prolog, but not the corresponding problem
in gfunc_call, which I'll try tackling next.
* fix some macro expansion issues
* add some pp tests in tests/pp
* improved tcc -E output for better diff'ability
* remove -dD feature (quirky code, exotic feature,
didn't work well)
Based partially on ideas / researches from PipCet
Some issues remain with VA_ARGS macros (if used in a
rather tricky way).
Also, to keep it simple, the pp doesn't automtically
add any extra spaces to separate tokens which otherwise
would form wrong tokens if re-read from tcc -E output
(such as '+' '=') GCC does that, other compilers don't.
* cleanups
- #line 01 "file" / # 01 "file" processing
- #pragma comment(lib,"foo")
- tcc -E: forward some pragmas to output (pack, comment(lib))
- fix macro parameter list parsing mess from
a3fc543459a715d7143d
(some coffee might help, next time ;)
- introduce TOK_PPSTR - to have character constants as
written in the file (similar to TOK_PPNUM)
- allow '\' appear in macros
- new functions begin/end_macro to:
- fix switching macro levels during expansion
- allow unget_tok to unget more than one tok
- slight speedup by using bitflags in isidnum_table
Also:
- x86_64.c : fix decl after statements
- i386-gen,c : fix a vstack leak with VLA on windows
- configure/Makefile : build on windows (MSYS) was broken
- tcc_warning: fflush stderr to keep output order (win32)
This patch disables the optimization of saving stack pointers lazily,
which didn't fully take into account that control flow might not reach
the stack-saving instructions. I've decided to leave in the extra calls
to vla_sp_save() in case anyone wants to restore this optimization.
Tests added and enabled.
There are two remaining bugs: VLA variables can be modified, and jumping
into the scope of a declared VLA will cause a segfault rather than a
compiler error. Both of these do not affect correct C code, but should
be fixed at some point. Once VLA variables have been made properly
immutable, we can share them with the saved stack pointer and save stack
and instructions.
The old code assumed that if an argument doesn't fit into the available
registers, none of the subsequent arguments do, either. But that's
wrong: passing 7 doubles, then a two-double struct, then another double
should generate code that passes the 9th argument in the 8th register
and the two-double struct on the stack. We now do so.
However, this patch does not yet fix the function calling code to do the
right thing in the same case.
With the x86_64 Linux ELF ABI, we're currently failing two of these
three tests, which have been disabled for now. The problem is mixed
structures such as struct { double x; char c; }, which the x86_64 ABI
specifies are to be passed/returned in one integer register and one SSE
register; our current approach, marking the structure as VT_QLONG or
VT_QFLOAT, fails in this case.
(It's possible to fix this by getting rid of VT_QLONG and VT_QFLOAT
entirely as at https://github.com/pipcet/tinycc, but the changes aren't
properly isolated at present. Anyway, there might be a less disruptive
fix.)
- pop_macro incorrect with initially undefined macro
- horrible implementation (tcc_open_bf)
- crashes eventually (abuse of Sym->prev_tok)
- the (unrelated) asm_label part is the opposite of a fix
(Despite of its name this variable has nothing to do with
the built-in assembler)
This reverts commit 0c8447db79.
I ran into an issue playing with tinycc, and tracked it down to a rather
weird assumption in the function calling code. This breaks only when
varargs and float/double arguments are combined, I think, and only when
calling GCC-generated (or non-TinyCC, at least) code. The problem is we
sometimes generate code like this:
804a468: 4c 89 d9 mov %r11,%rcx
804a46b: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
804a470: 48 8b 45 c0 mov -0x40(%rbp),%rax
804a474: 4c 8b 18 mov (%rax),%r11
804a477: 41 ff d3 callq *%r11
for a function call. Note how $eax is first set to the correct value,
then clobbered when we try to load the function pointer into R11. With
the patch, the code generated is:
804a468: 4c 89 d9 mov %r11,%rcx
804a46b: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
804a470: 4c 8b 5d c0 mov -0x40(%rbp),%r11
804a474: 4d 8b 1b mov (%r11),%r11
804a477: 41 ff d3 callq *%r11
which is correct.
This becomes an issue when get_reg(RC_INT) is modified not always to
return %rax after a save_regs(0), because then another register (%ecx,
say) is clobbered, and the function passed an invalid argument.
A rather convoluted test case that generates the above code is
included. Please note that the test will not cause a failure because
TinyCC code ignores the %rax argument, but it will cause incorrect
behavior when combined with GCC code, which might wrongly fail to save
XMM registers and cause data corruption.
* give warning if pragma is unknown for tcc
* don't free asm_label in sym_free(),
it's a job of the asm_free_labels().
The above pragmas are used in the mingw headers.
Thise pragmas are implemented in gcc-4.5+ and current
clang.
Commit 5ce2154c ("-fdollar-in-identifiers addon", 20-04-2015) forgot
to include the test files from Daniel's patch.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
* define targetos=Windows when --enable-tcc32-mingw, --enable-cygwin, ...
* use TARGETOS insteed HOST_OS when selecting PROGS
* use "$(tccdir)" insteed $(tccdir) on install (spaces in path)
* install tcc.exe too
* produce bcheck.o when cross-compiling too (lib/Makefile)
* force bcheck.o linking by compiling inside tcc_set_output_type()
a dummy program with local array. Otherwise bcheck.o may be not linked.
* replace %xz format specifier with %p in bcheck (don't supported on
Windows)
* call a __bound_init when __bound_ptr_add, __bound_ptr_indir,
__bound_new_region, __bound_delete_region called.
This is because a __bound_init inside ".init" section is not called
on Windows for unknown reason.
* print on stderr a message when an illegal pointer is returned:
there is no segmentation violation on Windows for a program
compiled with "tcc -b"
* remove "C:" subdir on clean if $HOST_OS = "Linux"
* default CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O0" insteed CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2"
to speed up compilation and more precise debugging.
------------ libtest ------------
./libtcc_test lib_path=..
<string>:11: warning: implicit declaration of function 'printf'
<string>:13: warning: implicit declaration of function 'add'
------------ test3 ------------
tcctest.c:1982: warning: implicit declaration of function 'putchar'
tcctest.c:2133: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strlen'
int i = i++ causes a segfault because of missing guard. Looking
recursively at all backend functions called from middle end several more
guard appeared to be missing.
From: Matteo Cypriani <mcy@lm7.fr>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:22:56 -0400
Subject: Disable floating-point test for ARM soft-float
tcc is not yet capable of doing softfloat floating-point operations on
ARM, therefore we disable this test for these platforms. Note that tcc
displays a warning to warn ARM users about this limitation
(debian)
From: Matteo Cypriani <mcy@lm7.fr>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:22:56 -0400
Subject: Disable floating-point test for ARM soft-float
tcc is not yet capable of doing softfloat floating-point operations on
ARM, therefore we disable this test for these platforms. Note that tcc
displays a warning to warn ARM users about this limitation
(debian)
A non declared function leads to a seriuos problems. And while
gcc don't turn this warning on lets tcc do it. This warning
can be turned off by -Wno-implicit-function-declaration option.
And autor must explicitly do this if program must be compiled
with this warning off.
Vlad Vissoultchev