Change alloc_sym_attr into get_sym_attr and add a parameter to control
whether to allocate a new symattr structure or return NULL if symbol is
not found;
Currently GOT/PLT creation happens in two locations depending on whether
the GOT/PLT [entry] is required by the symbol or the relocation:
- bind_exe_dynsym for relocations to undefined symbol
- build_got_entries/put_got_entry for relocations that require a GOT/PLT
entry
This commit consolidate GOT/PLT creation in build_got_entries by
reducing bind_exe_dynsym's job to create a dynamic symbol for undefined
symbols. build_got_entries then invoke put_got_entry if the symbol being
relocated is undefined or the relocation asks for a PLT or GOT [entry].
put_got_entry is also modified to only export a symbol in the dynamic
symbol table when we are in the case of PLT/GOT [entry] required by the
relocation (since undefined symbol are already exported by
bind_exe_dynsym).
Currently we always build a GOT when we recognize a relocation in
build_got_entries even if the relocation does not require one. In the
same spirit, when the relocation does require one we always create a GOT
entry even if not entry is necessary. This patch restricts the creation
of a GOT and a GOT entry to relocations that needs it, ie:
- do not create a GOT if relocation is not related to GOT and symbol is
not UNDEF
- do not create a GOT entry if relocation only relates to beginning of
GOT
On ARM targets, the jump to ld.so resolution routine is done in PLT0 by
loading the offset to the GOT found in PLT+16 and from there loading the
address in GOT+8 and jumping to it.
Currently tcc starts the first regular PLT entry at PLT+16 which thus
does not contain the offset to the GOT. This commit fixes that.
Note that calls via PLT still worked nonetheless because of some missing
dynamic tag which makes ld.so behaves as if RTLD_BIND_NOW was specified
in the environment for all executable created by tcc.
add_elf_sym is a confusing name because it is not clear what the
function does compared to put_elf_sym. As a matter of fact, put_elf_sym
also adds a symbol in a symbol table. Besides, "add_elf_sym" fails to
convey that the function can be used to update a symbol (for instance
its value). "set_elf_sym" seems like a more appropriate name: it will
set a symbol to a given set of properties (value, size, etc.) and create
a new one if non exist for that name as one would expect.
Do not create a new symbol in add_elf_sym if a symbol with same properties
(value, size, info, etc.) already exists. This prevents symbols from
being exported twice in the dynamic symbol table.
Prior to this patch, an error would only be given when a library has an
unresolved undefined symbol if there is no undefined reference for the
same symbol in the executable itself. This patch changes the logic to
check both that the executable has the symbol in its static symbol table
*and* that it is defined to decide if the error path should be followed.
SHF_GROUP flag set on a section indicates that it is part of a section
group and that if the section is removed, the other sections in the same
group should be removed as well [1]. Since section group are guide for
the linking process, they do not have any meaning after linking has
occured. TCC rightfully [2] discard such sections (by not recognizing the
section type) but keeps the SHF_GROUP flag set on sections that were
part of a section group which confuses binutils (objdump and gdb at
least). Clearing that bit makes objdump and gdb accept binaries created
by TCC.
[1] https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19683-01/816-1386/chapter7-26/index.html
[2] GNU ld does the same
The problem was with tcctest.c:
unsigned set;
__asm__("btsl %1,%0" : "=m"(set) : "Ir"(20) : "cc");
when with tcc compiled with the HAVE_SELINUX option, run with
tcc -run, it would use large addresses far beyond the 32bits
range when tcc did not use the pc-relative mode for accessing
'set' in global data memory. In fact the assembler did not
know about %rip at all.
Changes:
- memory operands use (%rax) not (%eax)
- conversion from VT_LLOCAL: use type VT_PTR
- support 'k' modifier
- support %rip register
- support X(%rip) pc-relative addresses
The test in tcctest.c is from Michael Matz.
With -b, this produces garbage. Code to call __bound_local_new
is put at wrong place, overwriting the regparam setup code.
Fix copied from x86_64-gen.c.
void __attribute__((regparm(3)))
fun(int unused)
{
char local[1];
}
- call RtlDeleteFunctionTable
(important for multiple compilations)
- the RUNTIME_FUNCTION* is now at the beginning of the
runtime memory. Therefor when tcc_relocate is called
with user memory, this should be done manually before
it is free'd:
RtlDeleteFunctionTable(*(void**)user_mem);
[ free(user_mem); ]
- x86_64-gen.c: expand char/short return values to int
FreeBSDs system headers contain unconditional usage of
macros like __aligned(x), which are only conditionally defined
in sys/cdefs.h (conditional on __GNUC__ or __INTEL_COMPILER).
Bug in FreeBSD, but as work-around we can define __GNUC__ which
picks up these defs.
[This also moves back the glibc defines we had before into the
non-BSD ifdef branch]
With the last improvements to lexpand it's now harmful
to use on native 64bit platforms when not necessary. For gv_dup
it's not necessary there. It can still be used with really
transforming a 64bit value into two 32bit ones.
Previously, long longs were 'lexpand'ed into two registers
always.
Now, it expands
- constants into two constants (lo-part, hi-part)
- variables into two lvalues with offset+4 for the hi-part.
This makes long long operations look a bit nicer.
Also: don't apply i386 'inc/dec' optimization if carry
generation is wanted.
gen_cast() failed to truncate long long's if they
were unsigned, which was causing mess on the vstack.
There was a similar bug here
tccgen: 32bits: fix PTR +/- long long
ed15cddacd
Both were not visible until this patch
tccgen: arm/i386: save_reg_upstack
b691585785
I'd still assume that this patch is correct per se.
Also:
- remove 2x !nocode_wanted (we are already under a general
"else if (!nocode_wanted)" clause above).
__GNUC__ nowadays as macro seems to mean the "GNU C dialect"
rather than the compiler itself. See also
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-07/msg00026.html
This patch will probably cause problems of various kinds but
maybe we should try nonetheless.
With -run the call instruction and a defined function can be
far away, if the function is defined in the executable itself,
not in the to be compiled code. So we always need PLT slots
for -run, not just for undefined symbols.
Previously in order to perform a ll+ll operation tcc
was trying to 'lexpand' PTR in gen_opl which did
not work well. The case:
int printf(const char *, ...);
char t[] = "012345678";
int main(void)
{
char *data = t;
unsigned long long r = 4;
unsigned a = 5;
unsigned long long b = 12;
*(unsigned*)(data + r) += a - b;
printf("data %s\n", data);
return 0;
}
Thomas Preud'homme