/* * SGI FREE SOFTWARE LICENSE B (Version 2.0, Sept. 18, 2008) * Copyright (C) 1991-2000 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. * * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: * * The above copyright notice including the dates of first publication and * either this permission notice or a reference to * http://oss.sgi.com/projects/FreeB/ * shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. * * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS * OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL * SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE * SOFTWARE. * * Except as contained in this notice, the name of Silicon Graphics, Inc. * shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or * other dealings in this Software without prior written authorization from * Silicon Graphics, Inc. */ /* ** Author: Eric Veach, July 1994. ** */ #include #include #include "windef.h" #include "winbase.h" #include "tess.h" int __gl_vertLeq( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v ) { /* Returns TRUE if u is lexicographically <= v. */ return VertLeq( u, v ); } GLdouble __gl_edgeEval( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w ) { /* Given three vertices u,v,w such that VertLeq(u,v) && VertLeq(v,w), * evaluates the t-coord of the edge uw at the s-coord of the vertex v. * Returns v->t - (uw)(v->s), i.e. the signed distance from uw to v. * If uw is vertical (and thus passes through v), the result is zero. * * The calculation is extremely accurate and stable, even when v * is very close to u or w. In particular if we set v->t = 0 and * let r be the negated result (this evaluates (uw)(v->s)), then * r is guaranteed to satisfy MIN(u->t,w->t) <= r <= MAX(u->t,w->t). */ GLdouble gapL, gapR; assert( VertLeq( u, v ) && VertLeq( v, w )); gapL = v->s - u->s; gapR = w->s - v->s; if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) { if( gapL < gapR ) { return (v->t - u->t) + (u->t - w->t) * (gapL / (gapL + gapR)); } else { return (v->t - w->t) + (w->t - u->t) * (gapR / (gapL + gapR)); } } /* vertical line */ return 0; } GLdouble __gl_edgeSign( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w ) { /* Returns a number whose sign matches EdgeEval(u,v,w) but which * is cheaper to evaluate. Returns > 0, == 0 , or < 0 * as v is above, on, or below the edge uw. */ GLdouble gapL, gapR; assert( VertLeq( u, v ) && VertLeq( v, w )); gapL = v->s - u->s; gapR = w->s - v->s; if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) { return (v->t - w->t) * gapL + (v->t - u->t) * gapR; } /* vertical line */ return 0; } /*********************************************************************** * Define versions of EdgeSign, EdgeEval with s and t transposed. */ GLdouble __gl_transEval( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w ) { /* Given three vertices u,v,w such that TransLeq(u,v) && TransLeq(v,w), * evaluates the t-coord of the edge uw at the s-coord of the vertex v. * Returns v->s - (uw)(v->t), i.e. the signed distance from uw to v. * If uw is vertical (and thus passes through v), the result is zero. * * The calculation is extremely accurate and stable, even when v * is very close to u or w. In particular if we set v->s = 0 and * let r be the negated result (this evaluates (uw)(v->t)), then * r is guaranteed to satisfy MIN(u->s,w->s) <= r <= MAX(u->s,w->s). */ GLdouble gapL, gapR; assert( TransLeq( u, v ) && TransLeq( v, w )); gapL = v->t - u->t; gapR = w->t - v->t; if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) { if( gapL < gapR ) { return (v->s - u->s) + (u->s - w->s) * (gapL / (gapL + gapR)); } else { return (v->s - w->s) + (w->s - u->s) * (gapR / (gapL + gapR)); } } /* vertical line */ return 0; } GLdouble __gl_transSign( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w ) { /* Returns a number whose sign matches TransEval(u,v,w) but which * is cheaper to evaluate. Returns > 0, == 0 , or < 0 * as v is above, on, or below the edge uw. */ GLdouble gapL, gapR; assert( TransLeq( u, v ) && TransLeq( v, w )); gapL = v->t - u->t; gapR = w->t - v->t; if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) { return (v->s - w->s) * gapL + (v->s - u->s) * gapR; } /* vertical line */ return 0; } int __gl_vertCCW( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w ) { /* For almost-degenerate situations, the results are not reliable. * Unless the floating-point arithmetic can be performed without * rounding errors, *any* implementation will give incorrect results * on some degenerate inputs, so the client must have some way to * handle this situation. */ return (u->s*(v->t - w->t) + v->s*(w->t - u->t) + w->s*(u->t - v->t)) >= 0; } /* Given parameters a,x,b,y returns the value (b*x+a*y)/(a+b), * or (x+y)/2 if a==b==0. It requires that a,b >= 0, and enforces * this in the rare case that one argument is slightly negative. * The implementation is extremely stable numerically. * In particular it guarantees that the result r satisfies * MIN(x,y) <= r <= MAX(x,y), and the results are very accurate * even when a and b differ greatly in magnitude. */ #define Interpolate(a,x,b,y) \ (a = (a < 0) ? 0 : a, b = (b < 0) ? 0 : b, \ ((a <= b) ? ((b == 0) ? ((x+y) / 2) \ : (x + (y-x) * (a/(a+b)))) \ : (y + (x-y) * (b/(a+b))))) #define Swap(a,b) do { GLUvertex *t = a; a = b; b = t; } while (0) void __gl_edgeIntersect( GLUvertex *o1, GLUvertex *d1, GLUvertex *o2, GLUvertex *d2, GLUvertex *v ) /* Given edges (o1,d1) and (o2,d2), compute their point of intersection. * The computed point is guaranteed to lie in the intersection of the * bounding rectangles defined by each edge. */ { GLdouble z1, z2; /* This is certainly not the most efficient way to find the intersection * of two line segments, but it is very numerically stable. * * Strategy: find the two middle vertices in the VertLeq ordering, * and interpolate the intersection s-value from these. Then repeat * using the TransLeq ordering to find the intersection t-value. */ if( ! VertLeq( o1, d1 )) { Swap( o1, d1 ); } if( ! VertLeq( o2, d2 )) { Swap( o2, d2 ); } if( ! VertLeq( o1, o2 )) { Swap( o1, o2 ); Swap( d1, d2 ); } if( ! VertLeq( o2, d1 )) { /* Technically, no intersection -- do our best */ v->s = (o2->s + d1->s) / 2; } else if( VertLeq( d1, d2 )) { /* Interpolate between o2 and d1 */ z1 = EdgeEval( o1, o2, d1 ); z2 = EdgeEval( o2, d1, d2 ); if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; } v->s = Interpolate( z1, o2->s, z2, d1->s ); } else { /* Interpolate between o2 and d2 */ z1 = EdgeSign( o1, o2, d1 ); z2 = -EdgeSign( o1, d2, d1 ); if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; } v->s = Interpolate( z1, o2->s, z2, d2->s ); } /* Now repeat the process for t */ if( ! TransLeq( o1, d1 )) { Swap( o1, d1 ); } if( ! TransLeq( o2, d2 )) { Swap( o2, d2 ); } if( ! TransLeq( o1, o2 )) { Swap( o1, o2 ); Swap( d1, d2 ); } if( ! TransLeq( o2, d1 )) { /* Technically, no intersection -- do our best */ v->t = (o2->t + d1->t) / 2; } else if( TransLeq( d1, d2 )) { /* Interpolate between o2 and d1 */ z1 = TransEval( o1, o2, d1 ); z2 = TransEval( o2, d1, d2 ); if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; } v->t = Interpolate( z1, o2->t, z2, d1->t ); } else { /* Interpolate between o2 and d2 */ z1 = TransSign( o1, o2, d1 ); z2 = -TransSign( o1, d2, d1 ); if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; } v->t = Interpolate( z1, o2->t, z2, d2->t ); } }