This @first_key variable is introduced in f5c4c4f3b7
("btrfsck: add code to rebuild extent records"), however it's not only
unused, but also used incorrectly.
It's calling btrfs_item_key_to_cpu() on an node extent buffer.
Anyway, just remove it.
Fixes: f5c4c4f3b7 ("btrfsck: add code to rebuild extent records")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For inline compressed file extent, kernel doesn't allow inline extent
ram size larger than sector size and on-disk inline extent size should
not exceed BTRFS_MAX_INLINE_DATA_SIZE().
For inline uncompressed file extent, kernel doesn't allow inline extent
ram and on-disk size larger than either BTRFS_MAX_INLINE_DATA_SIZE() or
sector size.
Check it in original mode.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Under some cases the filesystem checker reports an error when it finds
checksum items for an extent that is referenced by an inode as a prealloc
extent. Such cases are not an error when the extent is actually shared
(was cloned/reflinked) with other inodes and was written through one of
those other inodes.
Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ touch /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256K" /mnt/foo
$ sync
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 256K" /mnt/foo
$ touch /mnt/bar
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/foo 0 0 256K" /mnt/bar
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/bar
<power fail>
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ umount /mnt
$ btrfs check /dev/sdc
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb
UUID: 52d3006e-ee3b-40eb-aa21-e56253a03d39
checking extents
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
root 5 inode 257 errors 800, odd csum item
ERROR: errors found in fs roots
found 688128 bytes used, error(s) found
total csum bytes: 256
total tree bytes: 163840
total fs tree bytes: 65536
total extent tree bytes: 16384
btree space waste bytes: 138819
file data blocks allocated: 10747904
referenced 10747904
$ echo $?
1
So teach check to not report such cases as errors by checking if the
extent is shared with other inodes and if so, consider it an error the
existence of checksum items only if all those other inodes are referencing
the extent as a prealloc extent.
This case can be hit often when running the generic/475 testcase from
fstests.
A test case will follow in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Btrfs can delay inode deletion and in that case btrfs will unlink the
victim inode from its parent dir, and insert a marker to info btrfs to
delete it later.
In that case, such victim inode will have nlinks == 0, but is still
completely valid.
Original mode won't report such problem, but lowmem mode doesn't check
the ORPHAN_ITEM key for such inode, and can report false alert like:
------
ERROR: root 257 INODE[28891726] is orphan item
------
Fix such false alert by checking orphan item for inode whose nlink is 0.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Btrfs lowmem check reports the following false alert:
------
ERROR: file extent[267 2162688] root 256 owner 5 backref lost
------
The file extent is in the leaf which is shared by file tree 256 and fs
tree.
------
leaf 30605312 items 46 free space 4353 generation 7 owner 5
......
item 45 key (267 EXTENT_DATA 2162688) itemoff 5503 itemsize 53
generation 7 type 2 (prealloc)
prealloc data disk byte 13631488 nr 65536
prealloc data offset 32768 nr 32768
------
And there is the corresponding extent_data_ref item in the extent tree.
------
item 1 key (13631488 EXTENT_DATA_REF 1007496934287921081) itemoff 15274 itemsize 28
extent data backref root 5 objectid 267 offset 2129920 count 1
------
The offset of EXTENT_DATA_REF which is the hash of the owner root objectid,
the inode number and the calculated offset (file offset - extent offset).
What caused the false alert is the code mix up the owner root objectid and
the file tree objectid.
Fixes: b0d360b541 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check data backref in extent tree")
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of the disk_bytenr and disk_num_bytes of the extent_item which the
file extent references, we should output the objectid and offset of the
file extent. And the leaf may be shared by the file trees, we should print
the objectid of the root and the owner of the leaf.
Fixes: b0d360b541 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check data backref in extent tree")
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When we found free space difference between free space cache and block
group item, we just discard this free space cache.
Normally such difference is caused by btrfs_reserve_extent() called by
delalloc which is out of a transaction.
And since all btrfs_release_extent() is called with a transaction, under
heavy race free space cache can have less free space than block group
item.
Normally kernel will detect such difference and just discard that cache.
However we must be more careful if free space cache has more free space
cache, and if that happens, paried with above race one invalid free
space cache can be loaded into kernel.
So if we find any free space cache who has more free space then block
group item, we report it as an error other than ignoring it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This bug is exposed by fsck-test with D=asan, hit by test case 020, with
the following error report:
=================================================================
==10740==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x621000061580 at pc 0x56051f0db6cd bp 0x7ffe170f3e20 sp 0x7ffe170f3e10
READ of size 1 at 0x621000061580 thread T0
#0 0x56051f0db6cc in btrfs_extent_inline_ref_type /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.h:1727
#1 0x56051f13b669 in build_roots_info_cache /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14306
#2 0x56051f13c86a in repair_root_items /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14450
#3 0x56051f13ea89 in cmd_check /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14965
#4 0x56051efe75bb in main /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/btrfs.c:302
#5 0x7f04ddbb0f49 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x20f49)
#6 0x56051efe68c9 in _start (/home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/btrfs+0x5b8c9)
0x621000061580 is located 0 bytes to the right of 4224-byte region [0x621000060500,0x621000061580)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x7f04ded50ce1 in __interceptor_calloc /build/gcc/src/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cc:70
#1 0x56051f04685e in __alloc_extent_buffer /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/extent_io.c:553
#2 0x56051f047563 in alloc_extent_buffer /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/extent_io.c:687
#3 0x56051efff1d1 in btrfs_find_create_tree_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/disk-io.c:187
#4 0x56051f000133 in read_tree_block /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/disk-io.c:327
#5 0x56051efeddb8 in read_node_slot /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:652
#6 0x56051effb0d9 in btrfs_next_leaf /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/ctree.c:2853
#7 0x56051f13b343 in build_roots_info_cache /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14267
#8 0x56051f13c86a in repair_root_items /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14450
#9 0x56051f13ea89 in cmd_check /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/cmds-check.c:14965
#10 0x56051efe75bb in main /home/adam/btrfs/btrfs-progs/btrfs.c:302
#11 0x7f04ddbb0f49 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x20f49)
It's completely possible that one extent/metadata item has no inline
reference, while build_roots_info_cache() doesn't have such check.
Fix it by checking @iref against item end to avoid such problem.
Issue: #92
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since we're moving tons of code, it's a good idea to fix all errors and
warnings from checkpatch.
Note: we don't rely on checkpatch, take its warnings and errors as a
hint and do not blindly fix anything that gets reported. The code
follows some style that should be kept and is not in 100% with
what checkpatch finds. Always apply your common sense and decide
if the change makes sense or if it is really making the code
better.
Additional fixes from dsterba:
- %Lu -> %llu
- lowercase first word or messages
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ added note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There used to be some functions with _v2 suffix to distinguish them from
original mode that had similar functions.
However now when the lowmem mode is moved to own check/lowmem.[ch],
cleanup the _v2 suffixes, and for functions that really need to be
distinguished from original mode (exported functions), change the _v2
suffix to _lowmem.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since lowmem mode code is highly internally connected, it's pretty hard to
move them piece by piece.
In theory it's possible to move part of the functions and temporarily
export them, but it will just cause extra temporarily modifications.
So this patch moves the whole lowmem check part into its own
check/lowmem.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Both original and lowmem modes share this function to do readahead.
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Move __create_inode_item() function to check/common.c and rename it to
insert_inode_item(), with comment added.
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Despite of moving it to check/common.c, also:
1) Add extra comment of the function
2) Change @root parameter to @fs_info
Since @root is never used, csum_root is picked from fs_info anyway.
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Just another small wrapper shared between original and lowmem mode.
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is shared between original and lowmem mode, and it's small
enough, so move it to check/common.h.
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are a dozen of variables which are used as "check global"
variables, like @total_csum_bytes or @no_holes.
These variables are used freely across the check code, however since
we're splitting check code, they need to be exported so they can be used
in other files.
This patch just export them and add declarations for them in
check/common.h.
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Unlike original mode, lowmem mode mostly uses normal tree operations, so
no structure definitions, only a lot of random error bits.
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Qu Wenruo