In convert we use trans->block_reserved >= 4096 as a threshold to commit
transaction, where block_reserved is the number of new tree blocks
allocated inside a transaction.
The problem is, we still have a hidden bug in delayed ref implementation
in btrfs-progs, when we have a large enough transaction, delayed ref may
failed to find certain tree blocks in extent tree and cause transaction
abort.
This fix will workaround it by committing transaction at a much lower
threshold.
The old 4096 means 4096 new tree blocks, when using default (16K)
nodesize, it's 64M, which can contain over 12k inlined data extent or
csum for around 60G, or over 800K file extents.
The new threshold will limit the size of new tree blocks to 2M, aligning
with the chunk preallocator threshold, and reducing the possibility to
hit that delayed ref bug.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Similar to the changes where strerror(errno) was converted, continue
with the remaining cases where the argument was stored in another
variable.
The savings in object size are about 4500 bytes:
$ size btrfs.old btrfs.new
text data bss dec hex filename
805055 24248 19748 849051 cf49b btrfs.old
804527 24248 19748 848523 cf28b btrfs.new
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[Bug]
On btrfs converted from ext*, one user reported the following kernel
warning:
------------[ cut here ]------------
BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -95)
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 324 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3042 btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x7ab/0x850 [btrfs]
Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
RIP: 0010:btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x7ab/0x850 [btrfs]
...
Call Trace:
normal_work_helper+0x39/0x370 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x1ce/0x410
worker_thread+0x2b/0x3d0
? process_one_work+0x410/0x410
kthread+0x113/0x130
? kthread_create_on_node+0x70/0x70
? do_syscall_64+0x74/0x190
? SyS_exit_group+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
---[ end trace c8ed62ff6a525901 ]---
BTRFS: error (device dm-2) in
btrfs_finish_ordered_io:3042: errno=-95 unknown
BTRFS info (device dm-2): forced readonly
BTRFS error (device dm-2): pending csums is 6447104
[Cause]
The call trace and the unique return value points to
__btrfs_drop_extents(), when we tries to drop pages of an inline extent,
we will trigger such -EOPNOTSUPP.
However kernel has limitation on the size of inline file extent
(sector size for ram size and sector size - 1 for on-disk size),
btrfs-convert doesn't have the same limitation, resulting much larger
file extent.
The lack of correct inline extent size check dates back to 2008 when
btrfs-convert is added into btrfs-progs.
[Fix]
Fix the inline extent creation condition, not only using
BTRFS_MAX_INLINE_DATA_SIZE(), which is only the maximum size of inline
data according to nodesize, but also limit it against sector size.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In latest e2fsprogs (1.44.0) definition of ext2_ext_attr_entry has
removed member e_value_block, as currently ext* doesn't support it set
anyway.
So remove such check so that we can pass compile.
Issue: #110
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199071
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Exposed by convert-test with D=asan.
Unlike btrfs, ext2fs_close() still leaves its ext2_filsys parameter
filled with allocated pointers.
It needs ext2fs_free() to free those pointers.
Issue: #92
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Do a cleanup. Also make it consistent with kernel. Use fs_info instead
of root for BTRFS_MAX_INLINE_DATA_SIZE, since maybe in some situation we
do not know root, but just know fs_info.
Change macro to inline function to be consistent with kernel. And
change the function body to match kernel.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Do a cleanup. Also make it consistent with kernel. Use fs_info instead
of root for BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE, since maybe in some situation we do
not know root, but just know fs_info.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently transaction bugs out insided btrfs_start_transaction in case
of error, we want to lift the error handling to the callers. This patch
adds the BUG_ON anywhere it's been missing so far. This is not the best
way of course. Transforming BUG_ON to a proper error handling highly
depends on the caller and should be dealt with case by case.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The status display was reading the state while the task was updating
it. Use a mutex to prevent the race.
This race was detected using ThreadSanitizer and
misc-tests/005-convert-progress-thread-crash.
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race
Write of size 8 by main thread:
#0 ext2_copy_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/source-ext2.c:853
#1 copy_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:145
#2 do_convert btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1297
#3 main btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1924
Previous read of size 8 by thread T1:
#0 print_copied_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:124
Location is stack of main thread.
Thread T1 (running) created by main thread at:
#0 pthread_create <null>
#1 task_start btrfs-progs/task-utils.c:50
#2 do_convert btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1295
#3 main btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1924
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race
btrfs-progs/convert/source-ext2.c:853 in ext2_copy_inodes
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With the current btrfs-convert, if we convert a ext4 without data checksum,
it'd not set nodatasum flag in inode item, nor create csum item, reading
file ends up with checksum errors.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With larger file system (in this case its 22TB), ext2fs_open() returns
EXT2_ET_CANT_USE_LEGACY_BITMAPS error message with
ext2fs_read_block_bitmap().
To overcome this issue,
(a) we need pass EXT2_FLAG_64BITS flag with ext2fs_open.
(b) use 64-bit functions like ext2fs_get_block_bitmap_range2,
ext2fs_inode_data_blocks2,ext2fs_read_ext_attr2
(c) use 64bit types with btrfs_convert_context fields
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194795
Signed-off-by: Lakshmipathi.G <lakshmipathi.g@giis.co.in>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Build under musl libc fails because of missing PATH_MAX and XATTR_NAME_MAX
macro declarations. Add the required headers.
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Use one flag field instead of several variables. The change cascades
down to the callchain and modifies several functions.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba