Commit Graph

93 Commits (0d84aa903a51c472f273b02da98da2f6160e4289)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Filipe David Borba Manana 6c9caa4dd6 btrfs-progs: check, fix csum check in the presence of non-inlined refs
When we have non-inlined extent references, we were failing to find the
corresponding extent item for an existing csum item in the csum tree.

Reproducer:

   mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
   mount /dev/sdd /mnt

   xfs_io -f -c "falloc 780366 135302" /mnt/foo
   xfs_io -c "falloc 327680 151552" /mnt/foo
   xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 131072 0 131072" /mnt/foo
   sync

   for i in `seq 1 40`; do btrfs subvolume snapshot /mnt /mnt/snap$i ; done
   umount /mnt

   btrfs check /dev/sdd

The check command exited with status 1 and the following output:

   Checking filesystem on /dev/sdd
   UUID: 2416ab5f-9d71-457e-bb13-a27d4f6b399a
   checking extents
   checking free space cache
   checking fs roots
   checking csums
   There are no extents for csum range 12980224-12984320
   Csum exists for 12980224-12984320 but there is no extent record
   found 1388544 bytes used err is 1
   total csum bytes: 132
   total tree bytes: 704512
   total fs tree bytes: 573440
   total extent tree bytes: 16384
   btree space waste bytes: 564479
   file data blocks allocated: 19341312
    referenced 14606336
   Btrfs v3.14.1-94-g80597e7

After this change it no longer erroneously reports a missing extent for the
csum item and exits with a status of 0.

Also added missing btrfs_prev_leaf() return value checks, as we were ignoring
errors and non-existence of left siblings completely.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-10 10:38:29 +02:00
Wang Shilong 8909f11042 btrfs-progs: fsck: add ability to check reloc roots
When encountering system crash or balance enospc errors,
there maybe still some reloc roots left.

The way we store reloc root is different from fs root:

reloc root's root key(BTRFS_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM, objectid)
fs root's root key(objectid, ROOT_ITEM, -1)
reloc data's root key(BTRFS_DATA_RELOC_TREE_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM, 0)

So this patch use right key to search corresponding root node, and
avoid using normal fs root cache for reloc roots.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-10 10:38:26 +02:00
Wang Shilong 1d0a3eac0c btrfs-progs: fsck: finish transaction commit if repair error out
If btrfsck fail to repair, we hit something like following:

Check tree block failed, want=29442048, have=0
Check tree block failed, want=29442048, have=0
Check tree block failed, want=29442048, have=0
Check tree block failed, want=29442048, have=0
Check tree block failed, want=29442048, have=0
read block failed check_tree_block
found 98304 bytes used err is 1
total csum bytes: 0
total tree bytes: 0
total fs tree bytes: 0
total extent tree bytes: 0
btree space waste bytes: 0
file data blocks allocated: 0
referenced 0
Btrfs v3.14.2-rc2-63-g3944f15
btrfs: transaction.h:38: btrfs_start_transaction: Assertion `!(root->commit_root)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

This is because under repair mode, we will start a transaction, and if we error out,
we don't finish this transaction. So in close_ctree(), it will try
to start and commit transaction which causes the above segmentation.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-10 10:38:23 +02:00
Wang Shilong f495a2ac66 btrfs-progs: fsck: remove unfriendly BUG_ON() for searching tree failure
Now btrfsck would hit assertation failure for some searching tree failure.
It is true that filesystem may get some metadata block corrupted,
and btrfsck could not deal with these corruptings. But, Users really
don't want a BUG_ON() here, Instead, just return errors to caller.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-10 10:38:21 +02:00
Wang Shilong adfe8b5cfb btrfs-progs: fsck: clear out log tree in repair mode
Repair mode will commit transaction which will make us
fail to load log tree anymore.

Give a warning to common users, if they really want to
coninue, we will clear out log tree.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-10 10:38:18 +02:00
Wang Shilong 897c98de73 btrfs-progs: fsck: avoid pinning same block several times
This can not only give some speedups but also avoid forever loop
with a really broken filesystem.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-10 10:38:16 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 2c1b155988 btrfs-progs: Check the csum tree node before go through the csum tree
[BUG]
Some fsfuzzed btrfs image will cause btrfsck segfault.

[REPRODUCER]
Run btrfsck on a csum tree block corrupted image.

[REASON]
check_csums() function call btrfs_search_slot() on csum_tree but doesn't
check whether the csum_tree contains a valid extent_buffer, which causes
the segfault.

[FIX]
Check the csum_root->node before any search.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-01 16:35:33 +02:00
Josef Bacik 3fce2fa9a1 btrfs-progs: add root to dirty list when fixing bad keys
A user reported a WARN_ON() when trying to run btrfsck --repair on his fs with
bad key ordering.  This was because the root that was broken wasn't part of the
transaction yet.  We do this open coded thing in a few other places in fsck, so
just make it a helper function and make sure all the places that need to call it
do call it.  With this patch he was able to run repair without it dying.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-01 16:35:18 +02:00
Zach Brown 977f2baf36 btrfs-progs: kill BUG_ON in readahead_tree_block()
David sent a quick patch that removed a BUG_ON().  I took a peek and
found that the function was already leaking an eb ref and only returned
0.  So this fixes the leak and makes the function void and fixes up the
callers.

Accidentally-motivated-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-09-14 13:19:44 +02:00
David Sterba d34cbe76c7 btrfs-progs: check: do not require argument for --subvol-extents
$ btrfs check --subvol-extents /dev/sdx
ERROR: /dev/sdx is not a valid numeric value.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 16:09:56 +02:00
Gui Hecheng f1672e50c7 btrfs-progs: use check_argc_* to check arg number for all tools
Since this patch:
	btrfs-progs: move the check_argc_* functions into utils.c

All tools including the independent tools(e.g. btrfs-image, btrfs-convert)
can share the convenience of the check_argc_* functions, so this patch
adopt the argc check functions globally.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 15:07:02 +02:00
Mark Fasheh bc70abad8c btrfs-progs: show extent state for a subvolume
The qgroup verification code can trivially be extended to provide
extended information on the extents which a subvolume root
references. Along with qgroup-verify, I have found this tool to be
invaluable when tracking down extent references.

The patch adds a switch to the check subcommand '--subvol-extents'
which takes as args a single subvolume id. When run with the switch,
we'll print out each extent that the subvolume references. The extent
printout gives standard extent info you would expect along with
information on which other roots reference it.

Sample output follows - this is a few lines from a run on a subvolume
I've been testing qgroup changes on:

Print extent state for subvolume 281 on /dev/vdb2
UUID: 8203ca66-9858-4e3f-b447-5bbaacf79c02
Offset		Len	Root Refs	Roots
12582912	20480	12	257 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289
12603392	8192	12	257 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289
12611584	12288	12	257 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289
 <snip a bunch of extents to show some variety>
124583936	16384	4	281 282 283 280
125075456	16384	4	280 281 282 283
126255104	16384	11	257 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289
4763508736	4096	3	279 280 281

In case it wasn't clear, this applies on top of my qgroup verify patch:
"btrfs-progs: add quota group verify code"

A branch with all this can be found on github:

https://github.com/markfasheh/btrfs-progs-patches/tree/qgroup-verify

Please apply,

Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 15:04:16 +02:00
Wang Shilong 5e94319406 Btrfs-progs: fsck: reduce memory usage for extents check
Steps to reproduce:

 # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda9 -b 2g
 # mount /dev/sda9 /mnt
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data bs=4k oflag=direct
 # btrfs file df /mnt

    Data, single: total=1.66GiB, used=1.66GiB
    System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
    Metadata, single: total=200.00MiB, used=67.88MiB

For a filesystem without snapshots, 70M metadata, extent
checking eats max memory about 110M, this is a nightmare
for some system with low memory.

It is very likely that extent record can be freed quickly
for a filesystem without snapshots, improve this by trying
if it can free memory after adding data/tree backrefs.

This patch reduces max memory cost from 110M to 40M for
extents checking for the above case.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 14:43:11 +02:00
Hugo Mills b5fc0b9014 btrfs-progs: check: Fix wrong level access
There's no reason to assume that the bad key order is in a leaf block,
so accessing level 0 of the path is going to be an error if it's actually
a node block that's bad.

Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 14:43:10 +02:00
Wang Shilong 6d6f2d097e Btrfs-progs: fsck: switch to is_fstree()
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 14:43:09 +02:00
Wang Shilong 1bad2f2f2d Btrfs-progs: fsck: add an option to check data csums
This patch adds an option '--check-data-csum' to verify data checksums.
fsck won't check data csums unless users specify this option explictly.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 14:39:33 +02:00
Mark Fasheh 96ec888aad btrfs-progs: add quota group verify code
This patch adds functionality (in qgroup-verify.c) to compute bytecounts in
subvolume quota groups. The original groups are read in and stored in memory
so that after we compute our own bytecounts, we can compare them with those
on disk. A print function is provided to do this comparison and show the
results on the console.

A 'qgroup check' pass is added to btrfsck. If any subvolume quota groups
differ from what we compute, the differences for them are printed.  We also
provide an option '--qgroup-report' which will run only the quota check code
and print a report on all quota groups.  Other than making it possible to
verify that our qgroup changes work correctly, this mode can also be used in
xfstests for automated checking after qgroup tests.

This patch does not address the following:
- compressed counts are identical to non compressed, because kernel doesn't
  make the distinction yet.  Adding the code to verify compressed counts
  shouldn't be hard at all though once kernel can do this.
- It is only concerned with subvolume quota groups (like most of
  btrfs-progs).

Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 14:39:33 +02:00
Rakesh Pandit ad17d56084 Btrfs-progs: make smatch checker happy (trivial fixes)
It complains errno never gets assigned to zero in find-root and since
errno anyway is zero at program started up, lets remove it.

Check "copy is less then zero" isn't possible because strtoull used by
arg_strtou64 wouldn't return -ve number.

Trivial space fixes.

Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-05-02 17:03:45 +02:00
Rakesh Pandit 275fd93826 Btrfs-progs: fsck: while checking root refs print readable errors
Lets use "errors" instead of "error" because more then one ref errors
are possible. Also print error messages for unresolved refs in
check_root_refs.

Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-05-02 17:03:27 +02:00
Filipe David Borba Manana c17d0a73c1 Btrfs-progs: update btrfs_file_extent_inline_len to match kernel version
The following kernel commit changed the definition of the inline function
btrfs_file_extent_inline_len():

    commit 514ac8ad8793a097c0c9d89202c642479d6dfa34
    Author: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
    Date:   Fri Jan 3 21:07:00 2014 -0800

    Btrfs: don't use ram_bytes for uncompressed inline items

    If we truncate an uncompressed inline item, ram_bytes isn't updated to reflect
    the new size.  The fixe uses the size directly from the item header when
    reading uncompressed inlines, and also fixes truncate to update the
    size as it goes.

Not having this new definition implies that the restore tool might misbehave when
restoring files with an inline extent that got truncated on a kernel older than
release 3.14.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-04-11 19:47:29 +02:00
Wang Shilong 1d2b8a3f0b Btrfs-progs: fsck: fix wrong index in pick_next_pending()
Though all tree blocks have same size, we'd better use right
index here.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-04-11 19:05:40 +02:00
Wang Shilong 8bae5a1525 Btrfs-progs: fsck: reduce memory usage of extent record struct
Two changes:
	1.use bit filed for @found_rec
	2.u32 is enough to calculate duplicate extent number.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-04-11 19:05:40 +02:00
Wang Shilong c920facc18 Btrfs-progs: fsck: fix possible memory leaks in run_next_block()
We still need free allocated cache memory in case error happens.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-04-11 19:05:40 +02:00
Wang Shilong 30e72cc70d Btrfs-progs: fsck: don't free @seen cache until we finish searching
@seen cache is used to avoid iterating same block more than once, and
we can not free them until we have finished searching.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-04-11 19:05:39 +02:00
Rakesh Pandit bf357ff320 Btrfs-progs: fsck: fix memory leak and unnecessary call to free
Free already allocated memory to item1_data if malloc fails for
item2_data in swap_values. Seems to be a typo from commit 70749a77.

Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 09:51:31 -07:00
Wang Shilong 8d2359c8d9 Btrfs-progs: fsck: handle case that we can not lookup extent info
Previously, --init-extent-tree works just because btrfs_lookup_extent_info()
blindly return 0, and this make it work if there are not any *FULL BACKREF*
mode in broken filesystem.

It is just a coincidence that --init-extent-tree option works, let's
do it in the right way firstly.

For now, we have not supported to rebuild extent tree if there are
any *FULL BACKREF* mode which means if there are snapshots with broken
filesystem, avoid using --init-extent-tree option now.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:39 -07:00
Wang Shilong 706a90b122 Btrfs-progs: fsck: force to udate tree root for some cases
commit roots won't update root item in tree root if it finds
updated root's bytenr is same as before.

However, this is not right for fsck, we need update tree root in
the following case:

1.overwrite previous root node.

2.reinit reloc data tree, this is because we skip pin relo data
 tree before which means we can allocate same block as before.

Fix this by updating tree root ourselves for the above cases.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:38 -07:00
Wang Shilong 5ec1876c2c Btrfs-progs: fsck: insert root dir into reloc data tree when reiniting it
There are two bugs when resetting balance:

 1.we will skip reinitting reloc data tree if no reloc root found, however
  this is not right because we don't pin reloc data tree before.

 2.we should insert root dir into reloc data tree,otherwise we will fail
  to fsck.

Fix problems by forcely reiniting reloc data root and inserting root dir.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:37 -07:00
Wang Shilong 1c1e57eb8c Btrfs-progs: fsck: reset balance after reiniting extent root
reset balance need cow block which will insert extent item into
extent tree. If we do this before reinitting extent root, we may
encounter EEIXST.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:35 -07:00
Wang Shilong bedef66c0b Btrfs-progs: fsck: deal with really corrupted extent tree
To reinit extent root, we need find a free extent, however,
we may have a really corrupted extent tree, so we can't rely
on existed extent tree to cache block group any more.

During test, we fail to reinit extent tree which is because we
can not find a free extent so let's make block group cache ourselves
firstly.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:34 -07:00
Josef Bacik 47c18d17c5 Btrfs-progs: record generation for tree blocks in fsck
When working with a user who had a broken file system I noticed that we were
reading a bad copy of a block when the other copy was perfectly fine.  This is
because we don't keep track of the parent generation for tree blocks, so we just
read whichever copy we damned well please with no regards for which is best.
This fixes this problem by recording the parent generation of the tree block so
we can be sure to read the most correct copy before we check it, which will give
us a better chance of fixing really broken filesystems.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:30 -07:00
Wang Shilong 6262e12206 Btrfs-progs: fsck: fix wrong return value in check_block()
We found btrfsck will output backrefs mismatch while the filesystem
is defenitely ok.

The problem is that check_block() don't return right value,which
makes btrfsck won't walk all tree blocks thus we don't get a consistent
filesystem, we will fail to check extent refs etc.

Reported-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:25 -07:00
Wang Shilong acdf338c13 Btrfs-progs: fsck: avoid overwritting existed space when initting csum tree
Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda9
 # btrfs check /dev/sda9 --init-extent-tree --init-csum-tree
 # btrfs check /dev/sda9

During reinitting extent tree, we will pin all metadata blocks to
avoid overwritting existing metadata space. However, those space will
be unpinned after committing transaction.

If we try to reinit csum tree after reiniting extent tree, we may
overwrite existing space. Fix this problem by making reinit extent tree
and csum tree in same transaction.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:24 -07:00
Wang Shilong 64fddab8ac Btrfs-progs: switch to arg_strtou64() part3
Switch to new helper arg_strtou64(), also check if user assign
a valid super copy.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:20 -07:00
Gui Hecheng 015fba13cd btrfs-progs: fix fsck leaks on error returns
Add close_ctree()s before the "returns" on errors after open_ctree()
Also merge the err returns into the "goto + single return" pattern.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:17 -07:00
Mitch Harder 26b2f58d78 btrfs-progs: Remove superfluous BUG_ON check.
The function call that set the ret parameter evaluated in this
BUG_ON was removed in a previous commit:
11be10f71e
Btrfs-progs: make fsck fix certain file extent inconsistencies

Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:14 -07:00
Mitch Harder 5218123d8f btrfs-progs: Preserve process_one_leaf return value.
The return value in process_one_leaf could be over-written while
looping over the items in the leaf.

This patch will preserve a non-zero return value to the calling
function if a non-zero return value is encountered in the loop.

The return value of one (1) is consistent with non-zero values
that could be returned while processing the leaf.

The only caller of this function (walk_down_tree) would ignore
the return value anyway.  But this patch will correct the
behaviour in case future changes intend to utilize the return
value.

Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:13 -07:00
Anand Jain f920dbce8d btrfs-progs: btrfsck operations should be exclusive
this patch will make btrfsck operations to open disk in exclusive mode,
so that mount will fail when btrfsck is running

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:26 -08:00
Eryu Guan b2e99e1819 Btrfs-progs: check return value of read_tree_block() in check_chunks_and_extents()
The following steps could trigger btrfs segfault:

mkfs -t btrfs -m raid5 -d raid5 /dev/loop{0..3}
losetup -d /dev/loop2
btrfs check /dev/loop0

The reason is that read_tree_block() returns NULL and
add_root_to_pending() dereferences it without checking it first.

Also replace a BUG_ON with proper error checking.

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:25 -08:00
Josef Bacik 147114581d Btrfs-progs: add support for the no holes incompat flag
This adds the flag to ctree.h, adds the feature option to mkfs to turn it on and
fixes fsck so it doesn't complain about missing hole extents in files when this
flag is set.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:23 -08:00
Josef Bacik 70749a77fe Btrfs-progs: deal with invalid key orderings and bad orphan items V2
A user had a fs where the objectid of an orphan item was not the actual orphan
item objectid.  This screwed up fsck because the block has keys in the wrong
order, also the fs scanning stuff will freak out because we have an inode with
nlink 0 and no orphan item.  So this patch is pretty big but is all related.

1) Deal with bad key ordering.  We can easily fix this up, so fix the checking
stuff to tell us exactly what it found when it said there was a problem.  Then
if it's bad key ordering we can reorder the keys and restart the scan.

2) Deal with bad keys.  If we find an orphan item with the wrong objectid it's
likely to screw with stuff, so keep track of these sort of things with a
bad_item list and just run through and delete any objects that don't make sense.
So far we just do this for orphan items but we could extend this as new stuff
pops up.

3) Deal with missing orphan items.  This is easy, if we have a file with i_nlink
set to 0 and no orphan item we can just add an orphan item.

4) Add the infrastructure to corrupt actual key values.  Needed this to create a
test image to verify I was fixing things properly.

This patch fixes the corrupt image I'm adding and passes the other make test
tests.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:15 -08:00
Josef Bacik d04707f787 Btrfs-progs: reset balance before reiniting extent root
When we re-init the extent root we make it completely empty, so when we reset a
pending balance we will fail to find refs for any blocks we may cow, which will
result in errors and we will exit out.  We need to reset the balance first so
the normal cow stuff doesn't freak out and then we can re-init the extent tree.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:14 -08:00
Anand Jain b94a3003ae btrfs-progs: fix backref after init-csum-tree
btrfsck reports backref error after running init-csum-tree

btrfsck --init-csum-tree /dev/sdc
btrfsck /dev/sdc
::
ref mismatch on [29474816 16384] extent item 1, found 0
Backref 29474816 root 7 not referenced back 0x1101d30
Incorrect global backref count on 29474816 found 1 wanted 0
backpointer mismatch on [29474816 16384]
owner ref check failed [29474816 16384]
Errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
::

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:10 -08:00
Ross Kirk 7ff512ce38 btrfs-progs: Make btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid() return unsigned long
Internally, btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid() calculates an unsigned
long, but casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned
long again.

From btrfs commit b308bc2f05a86e728bd035e21a4974acd05f4d1e

Signed-off-by: Ross Kirk <ross.kirk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:04 -08:00
Anand Jain 1ecefced86 btrfs-progs: define BTRFS_UUID_UNPARSE_SIZE for uuid unparse buf size
we use 37 as the allocation size to hold the uuid_unparse, here
it defines BTRFS_UUID_UNPARSE_SIZE for the same.

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:03 -08:00
Miao Xie b4f4473e8a Btrfs-progs: don't output baffling message when checking a fresh fs
As we know,  a new fs doesn't have space cache, so we set the cache generation
of the super block to be -1ULL, it is not equal to the fs generation. But the
check program didn't consider this case, and output the following message

  cache and super generation don't match, space cache will be invalidated

directly, it would be baffling the users. So we should avoid outputing such
message. This patch fixes this problem.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:21:59 -08:00
Josef Bacik 1f5e3b2825 Btrfs-progs: allow --init-extent-tree to work when extent tree is borked
Unfortunately you can't run --init-extent-tree if you can't actually read the
extent root.  Fix this by allowing partial starts with no extent root and then
have fsck only check to see if the extent root is uptodate _after_ the check to
see if we are init'ing the extent tree.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:21:58 -08:00
Gui Hecheng 1cf9af2294 Btrfs-progs: fix btrfsck improper prompt on dropping snapshots
Exec btrfsck on btrfs with snapshots that are under a dropping
progress will cause prompt on "ref mismatch".
However we do not want this kind of prompt, since an remount
operation will continue the dropping progress.
Here the prompt is nonsense.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:21:56 -08:00
Eric Sandeen 18800f4a31 btrfs-progs: remove more dead code from check_extent_refs
e0a04278 removed a bunch of dead code but left one little
bit; reinit is always 0, so btrfs_read_block_groups is
never called from here.

Resolves-Coverity-CID: 1125926
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-07 16:10:41 -05:00
Josef Bacik 4735d0bb82 Btrfs-progs: rework open_ctree to take flags, add a new one V2
So I needed to add a flag to not try to read block groups when doing
--init-extent-tree since we could hang there, but that meant adding a whole
other 0/1 type flag to open_ctree_fs_info.  So instead I've converted it all
over to using a flags setting and added the flag that I needed.  This has been
tested with xfstests and make test.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-07 16:10:40 -05:00