Ran misc-tests/038 in /root/btrfs-progs:
make test-misc TEST=038\*
[TEST] misc-tests.sh
[TEST/misc] 038-backup-root-corruption
./test.sh: line 33: [: bytenr=65536,: integer expression expected
Backup slot 2 is not in use
test failed for case 038-backup-root-corruption
make: *** [Makefile:401: test-misc] Error 1
It's caused by the wrong line filtered by
$(dump_super | grep root | head -n1 | awk '{print $2}').
The command $(dump-super | grep root) outputs:
superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/root/btrfs-progs/tests/test.img
root 30605312
chunk_root_generation 5
root_level 0
chunk_root 22036480
chunk_root_level 0
log_root 0
log_root_transid 0
log_root_level 0
root_dir 6
backup_roots[4]:
Here
"superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/root/btrfs-progs/tests/test.img" is
selected but not the line "root 30605312".
Restricting the awk rule can fix it.
Fixes: 78a3831d46 ("btrfs-progs: tests: Test backup root retention logic")
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This tests ensures that the kernel correctly persists backup roots in
case the filesystem has been mounted from a backup root.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
[ cleanup to use common helpers ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
As misc-tests/021 image dump is restored on the same original loop
device, this overlaps with the stale data and makes the test pass
falsely.
Fix this by using a new device for restore.
And also, the btrfs-image dump and restore doesn't restore the file
data, so any read on the files should be avoided. So instead of file
data use file stat data for the checksum.
Reported-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of checking the kernel version, explicitly check for the
presence of metadata_uuid file in sysfs. This allows the test to be run
on older kernels that might have this feature backported.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The shell keyword function is not necessary and not used in many tests,
remove it from the few places that use it right now.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The travis-ci fails at test misc-tests/021-image-multi-devices because
the 'btrfs check' is not run with root permissions, unlike all the other
commands. The check is read-only by default, so that should be safe.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since the commmit 8dd3e5dc2d
("btrfs-progs: tests: fix misc-tests/029 to run on NFS") added the
compatibility of NFS, it called run_mayfail() in the last of the test.
However, run_mayfail() always return the original code. If the test
case is not running on NFS, the last `run_mayfail rmdir "$SUBVOL_MNT"`
will fail with return value 1 then the test fails:
================================================================
====== RUN MAYFAIL rmdir btrfs-progs/tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/subvol_mnt
rmdir: failed to remove 'btrfs-progs/tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/subvol_mnt': No such file or director
failed (ignored, ret=1): rmdir btrfs-progs/tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/subvol_mnt
test failed for case 029-send-p-different-mountpoints
=================================================================
Every instrument in this script handles its error well, so do exit 0
manually in the last.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202645
Fixes: 8dd3e5dc2d ("btrfs-progs: tests: fix misc-tests/029 to run on NFS")
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cleanups:
- add quotation
- use _log for messages
- unify spelling of metadata_uuid as feature and incompat bit
- add -- separators
- minor whitespace adjustments
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The directories created under default path needs a fallback in case it's
on NFS and root cannot create the directory. Update the test to create
only one additional mount point and use the TEST_MNT as the toplevel
one.
The error message we're looking for is now a bit weaker due to the less
specific path.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This ensures that 'btrfs filesystem show' can correctly identify a
filesystem on a newly created local file.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The temporary files are not accessible if the testsuite is hosted on
NFS, pre-create them and allow writes.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a test for a scenario that used to fail due to find_mount_root()
incorrectly determining the mount point for the receive path due to the
fact that a different mount point with a path that is a prefix of the
receive path exists.
This is fixed by a recent patch titled:
"Btrfs-progs: fix mount point detection due to partial prefix match"
Reported-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[ adjustments to make the test work when hosted on NFS ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a bunch of tests exercising the new btrfstune functionality. In
particular check that various restrictions are implemented correctly,
test that btrfs-image works as expected and also test the output of
btrfs inspect-internal dump-super is correct.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Test case misc/021 is testing if we could mount a single disk btrfs
image recovered from multi disk fs.
The problem is, current kernel has extra check for block group, chunk
and dev extent. This means no image can pass btrfs check for chunk
tree and the filesystem will not mount.
So do extra btrfs check before mount, this will also help us to locate
the problem in btrfs-image easier.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Total of three conditions are tested. One for short name, one with
name length 255, the last one with more than 255.
This case should pass after commit
'btrfs-progs: change filename limit to 255 when creating subvolume'.
Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a test which ensures the kernel returns the correct error value
when missing device removal is requested. This test verifies that kernel
refactoring didn't break the return value.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Test misc/029 only works if the test case is executed as root, while for
sudo usage, it doesn't work as initial mkdir and final cleanup doesn't
use $SUDO_HELPER.
Add "run_check $SUDO_HELPER" for such cases to allow it works under sudo
usage.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since commit aaf2dac5ef ("btrfs-progs: qgroup: split update_qgroup to
reduce arguments") cause qgroup show to output the wrong qgroup
parent-child relationship, in addition to fixing the problem, a test case
is needed to prevent the similar problem in the future.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Its function has been subsumed by "btrfs rescue zero-log". Remove its
source file and adjust make/tests soruces accordingly.
Deprecated since 4.0.
Issue: #97
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The commit cebf3b3722 ("btrfs-progs: introduce TEST_TOP and
INTERNAL_BIN for tests") did not convert all test paths. This would
break the exported testsutie.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use TEST_TOP as base for tests to reference any files, this will be used
for git and external testsuite.
INTERNAL_BIN is needed for referencing binaries that could reside in
different paths in git vs external testsuite.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ add quotes around sourced files, update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Transform the test to the common helpers and don't manage the loop
devices here. The test category changes from check to misc.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kernel 4.14 introduces new function for checking if all chunks is ok for
mount with -o degraded option.
commit 21634a19f646 ("btrfs: Introduce a function to check if all
chunks a OK for degraded rw mount")
As a result, raid0 profile cannot be mounted with -o degraded on 4.14.
This causes failure of the misc-test 011 "delete missing device".
Fix this by using raid1 profile for both data and metadata.
This also should work for kernel before 4.13.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Adds tests for the new features based on a prebuilt btrfs image with a
zstd compressed file.
Split from the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
[ with some cleanups ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This new test checks inspect-internal rootid
- handle path to subvolume/directory/file as an argument
- get different id for each subvolume
- get the expected id for each file/directory (i.e. the same as
containing subvolume)
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Test that we are able to create an image from a multiple devices fs, that
we are able to restore that image into a single device and finally that we
are able to mount it.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
[ added shell quotation and chmod a+w so testsuite on NFS works ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Patches "btrfs-progs: tests: correctly receive clones to mounted subvol"
(8eaf63bc9a) and followup are missing last
unmount which leads to failure of misc/020.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>