btrfs-progs: check: lowmem: Refactor extent len test in check_file_extent_inline

Instead of having another top-level if which checks for
'extent_num_bytes != item_inline_len' only if we are !compressed, just
move the 'if' inside the 'else' branch of the first top-level if, since
it has already checked for !compressed or not. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
master
Nikolay Borisov 2018-09-13 15:05:06 +03:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 2daecf07f3
commit a9cddf632f
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -1853,20 +1853,20 @@ static int check_file_extent_inline(struct btrfs_root *root,
extent_num_bytes, max_inline_extent_size);
err |= FILE_EXTENT_ERROR;
}
}
if (!compressed && extent_num_bytes != item_inline_len) {
error(
if (extent_num_bytes != item_inline_len) {
error(
"root %llu EXTENT_DATA[%llu %llu] wrong inline size, have: %llu, expected: %u",
root->objectid, fkey.objectid, fkey.offset,
extent_num_bytes, item_inline_len);
if (repair) {
ret = repair_inline_ram_bytes(root, path,
&extent_num_bytes);
if (ret)
if (repair) {
ret = repair_inline_ram_bytes(root, path,
&extent_num_bytes);
if (ret)
err |= FILE_EXTENT_ERROR;
} else {
err |= FILE_EXTENT_ERROR;
} else {
err |= FILE_EXTENT_ERROR;
}
}
}
*end += extent_num_bytes;