btrfs-progs: fix endian bugs in chunk rebuilding

A disk_key was set by hand instead of using the endian helpers.

I *think* the second one is just a typo.  The chunk's num_stripes was
already initialized from the record, but it's le16.  So we'll set the
item's size based on the record's native num_stripes.

Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
master
Zach Brown 2013-08-14 16:16:37 -07:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 51c5811583
commit 2cd95f945a
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1031,9 +1031,9 @@ static int __rebuild_chunk_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (min_devid > dev->devid)
min_devid = dev->devid;
}
disk_key.objectid = BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID;
disk_key.type = BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY;
disk_key.offset = min_devid;
btrfs_set_disk_key_objectid(&disk_key, BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID);
btrfs_set_disk_key_type(&disk_key, BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY);
btrfs_set_disk_key_offset(&disk_key, min_devid);
cow = btrfs_alloc_free_block(trans, root, root->sectorsize,
BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID,
@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ static int __rebuild_chunk_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
key.offset = chunk_rec->offset;
ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, chunk_root, &key, chunk,
btrfs_chunk_item_size(chunk->num_stripes));
btrfs_chunk_item_size(chunk_rec->num_stripes));
free(chunk);
if (ret)
return ret;